Back

Siniclang vs. CA

ROSITA P. SINICLANG, PETITIONER, V.S. THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS, THE HONORABLE OMBUDSMAN FOR LUZON AND ERNESTO A. LUCIANO, JR., RESPONDENTS. [G.R. No. 239855] ROSITA P. SINICLANG, PETITIONER, V.S. ERNESTO A. LUCIANO, JR., RESPONDENT. [G.R. No. 247366] ROSITA P. SINICLANG, PETITIONER, V.S. OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, AND ERNESTO A. LUCIANO, JR., RESPONDENTS. [G.R.No. 256013] ROSITA P. SINICLANG, PETITIONER, V.S. COMMISSION ON AUDIT, RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 234766 | 2022-10-18

D E C I S I O N
 
DIMAAMPAO, J.:
 
Before this Court are four consolidated petitions filed by petitioner Rosita P. Siniclang (Rosita) fulminating against separate issuances of the Court of Appeals and the Commission on Audit.

The Petition for Certiorari[1] in G.R. No. 234766 impugns two Resolutions dated 21 March 2017[2]  and 18 July 2017[3] of the Court of Appeals granting the Motion for Leave to Intervene (With Motion to Admit Attached Comment-in-Intervention)[4] filed by the Office of the Deputy Ombudsman for Luzon, and denying the Motion for Reconsideration[5] thereof, respectively, in...