Back

Espina vs. Soriano Jr. etc.

RAINIER A. ESPINA, PETITIONER, VS. HON. CHAIRMAN MANUEL SORIANO, JR., VICE-CHAIRMAN JULITA M. CALDERON, EMERITA DT. FRANCIA, AND MYLA TEONA N. TEOLOGIO IN THEIR CAPACITY AS MEMBERS OF THE INVESTIGATING PANEL CREATED PURSUANT TO OFFICE ORDER NO. 248, SERIES OF 2012, THE FACT-FINDING INVESTIGATION BUREAU, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY OMBUDSMAN FOR THE MILITARY AND OTHER LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICES (FFIB-MOLEO), THE HONORABLE OMBUDSMAN CONCHITA CARPIO MORALES, AND THE HONORABLE FOURTH DIVISION OF THE SANDIGANBAYAN, RESPONDENTS. [G.R. No. 208569] HENRY YLARDE DUQUE, PETITIONER, VS. HON. OMBUDSMAN AND FACT-FINDING INVESTIGATION BUREAU, OMBUDSMAN FOR THE MILITARY AND OTHER LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICES, RESPONDENT. [G.R. Nos. 209279 AND 209288] EULITO T. FUENTES, PETITIONER, VS. HON. OMBUDSMAN, THE FACT-FINDING INVESTIGATION BUREAU, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY OMBUDSMAN FOR THE MILITARY AND OTHER LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICES (FFIB-MOLEO), SANDIGANBAYAN FIFTH DIVISION, SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT, CHIEF OF THE PHILIPPINE NATIONAL POLICE, RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 208436 | 2023-07-25

D E C I S I O N
 
HERNANDO, J.:
 
Before this Court are two Petitions for Certiorari[1] and a Petition for Certiorari and Prohibition[2] under Rule 65 of the Rules of Court which challenged the December 27, 2012 Joint Resolution,[3] the January 18, 2013 Supplemental Joint Resolution,[4] and the July 8, 2013 Joint Order[5] (Assailed Resolutions) rendered by the Ombudsman in the consolidated criminal and administrative cases entitled Fact-Finding Investigation Bureau, Office of the Deputy Ombudsman for the Military and Other Law Enforcement Offices v. P/Dir. Avelino L. Razon, et al and...