Back

Aluzan vs. Fortunado

SYRUS J. ALUZAN, JOSE HENRY L. ARELLANO AND FERDINAND M. LAVIN, PETITIONERS, VS. EDDIE FORTUNADO, RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 249274 | 2023-08-30

D E C I S I O N
 
INTING, J.:
 
This resolves the Petition for Review on Certiorari[1] under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court seeking the review and reversal of the Decision[2] dated August 2, 2018, of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 11272. The CA found Syrus J. Aluzan (Aluzan), Jose Henry L. Arellano (Arellano), and Ferdinand M. Lavin (Lavin) (collectively, petitioners) guilty of Simple Neglect of Duty.[3] Likewise assailed is the CA Resolution[4] dated August 29, 2019, that denied petitioners' Motion for Reconsideration.[5]
 
The Antecedents

On September 11, 2014, Eddie Fortunado (Fortunado)...