Back

Mazda Quezon Avenue vs. Caruncho

MAZDA QUEZON AVENUE, PETITIONER, VS. ALEXANDER CARUNCHO, RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 232688 | 2021-04-26

DECISION
 
LEONEN, J.:
 
A supplier is liable for product imperfections that it cannot resolve within the warranty period. Moreover, the two-year prescriptive period for actions arising from the Consumer Act only runs from the expiration of the warranty period agreed upon by the parties.

This is a Petition for Review[1] seeking to set aside the Court of Appeals' Decision[2] and Resolution[3] dismissing the Petition for Certiorari filed by Mazda Quezon Avenue (Mazda). Mazda sought to annul the Department of Trade and Industry Appeals Committee's (Appeals Committee) Decision,[4] which affirmed the Department...