Back

Re: Statements Made by Lorraine Marie T. Badoy Allegedly Threatening Judge Marlo A. Magdoza-Malagar

RE: STATEMENTS MADE BY LORRAINE MARIE T. BADOY ALLEGEDLY THREATENING JUDGE MARLO A. MAGDOZA-MALAGAR. [G.R. No. 263384] ATTY. RICO V. DOMINGO, DEAN ANTONIO GABRIEL M. LA VIÑA, DEAN MA. SOLEDAD DERIQUITO-MAWIS, DEAN ANNA MARIA D. ABAD, DEAN RODEL A. TATON, ATTY. ARTEMIO P. CALUMPONG, ATTY. CHRISTIANNE GRACE F. SALONGA, ATTY. RAY PAOLO J. SANTIAGO, AND ATTY. AYN RUTH Z. TOLENTINO-AZARCON, PETITIONERS, VS. LORRAINE MARIE T. BADOY-PARTOSA, RESPONDENT.

A.M. No. 22-09-16-SC | 2023-08-15

D E C I S I O N
 
LEONEN, SAJ.:
 
As a fundamental principle of every democratic government,[1] the public's freedom of expression should be respected and protected to the fullest extent possible.[2] However, these rights must never threaten other equally important public interests, such as the maintenance of the courts' integrity and the orderly administration of justice.[3] Unwarranted attacks on the dignity of the courts are not constitutionally protected speech and may constitute contempt of court.
 
This Court resolves the consolidated cases pertaining to the contempt charges against Lorraine Marie T....