MyLegalWhiz

G.R. No. 174105 | 2009-04-02

of the opinion of the Court. REYNATO S. PUNO Chief Justice [1] Rollo, p. 39. [2] Id. at 41. [3] Id...

G.R. No. L-31342 |

JUAN T. BORROMEO, petitioner, vs. COURT OF APPEALS, EMMANUEL B. AZNAR, ALMA AZNAR and JOSE B. AZNAR... ., 34 SCRA 536 and People vs. Ursua, 60 Phil. 252. The Meralco resolution invoked by Borromeo...

A.M. No. MTJ-13-1823 | 2014-03-19

P/SR. INSP. TEDDY M. ROSQUETA, COMPLAINANT, VS. JUDGE JONATHAN A. ASUNCION, MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT... Javellana, A.M. No. MTJ-07-1666, September 5, 2012, 680 SCRA 13, 41-42.

^[26...

G.R. No. 19695 | 1922-11-17

District, Honorable FRANCISCO DOMINGUEZ, ROSA H. DE PORCUNA and her husband JUSTO M. PORCUNA and EULALIA... cited in Note 6; see also Louque vs. Dejan, 129 La., 519; Price vs. Western Loan and Savings Co., 19 Ann...

A.C. No. 378 | 1962-03-30

JOSE G. MEJIA and EMILIA N. ABRERA, complainants, vs. FRANCISCO S. REYES, respondent.... ., 23 and In re: De la Rosa, 27 Phil., 258). The respondent's act of appearing and acting as counsel...

G.R. No. 72313 | 1989-12-29

RICARDO CRUZ, petitioner, vs. HON. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT and ROMAN LEGARDA SO, respondents.... of the Philippines vs. De los Angeles, etc., et al. 11 which involved the question of whether the injured party may...

G.R. No. 124355 | 1999-09-21

CHING SEN BEN, married to CRISTINA TAN SIONG, petitioner, vs. COURT OF APPEALS, and DAVID VICENTE... herein being sold within a period of ONE (1) YEAR counted from the date hereof, for the amount...

G.R. No. 247798 | 2023-01-18

CONSTANCIA JAVATE-ASEJO, PETITIONER, VS. JUSTINIANO ZANTUA ASEJO AND REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES... .:

Before this Court is a Petition for Review on Certiorari,^[1] under Rule 45

...

G.R. Nos. L-26188, L-26189 and L-26190 | 1974-01-31

THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, plaintiff-appellee, vs. FRANCISCO DORIA, accused-appellant. THE... , 1961, 1 SCRA 1307; People vs. Mapa, L-15345, May 26, 1962, 5 SCRA 95). Appellants' assignment...

G.R. No. 234630 | 2019-06-10

OFFICE OF THE CITY MAYOR OF ANGELES CITY, PAMPANGA, MAYOR EDGARDO D. PAMINTUAN, PETITIONER, VS. DR... .:

Assailed in this petition for review on certiorari^[1] are the Decision^[2

...

G.R. No. 153510 | 2008-02-13

SCRA 666, 671. [12] G.R. No. 72129, February 7, 1990, 182 SCRA 1, 3-4. [13] Micro Sales Operation...

G.R. No. L-46395 | 1992-10-02

ARSENIA LACATAN-NUNEZ, petitioner, vs. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, CANLUBANG SUGAR ESTATE... in the subsequent cases of Vda. de los Santos vs. WCC (88 SCRA 134); Delana vs. WCC (83 SCRA 528); and Tolosa vs...

G.R. No. 182497 | 2010-06-29

PEREZ, J.:

Before this Court is a Petition for Certiorari under Rule 65^[1

...

G.R. No. 248256 | 2023-04-17

KAMERA WORLD INC., PETITIONER, VS. REDDOT IMAGING PHILIPPINES, INC., RESPONDENT.... .:

The case before the Court is a Petition for Review on Certiorari^[1] under

...

G.R. No. 229338 | 2024-04-17

MANILA PENINSULA HOTEL, INC., PETITIONER, VS. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.... .:

This Petition for Review on Certiorari^[1] (Petition) under Rule 45

...

G.R. No. 137815 | 2001-11-29

JUANITA T. SERING, petitioner, vs. COURT OF APPEALS and CLARITA L. GARCIA, respondents.... [1] to annul the decision[2] of the Court of Appeals involving the extra-judicial foreclosure...

G.R. Nos. 68580-81 | 1989-11-07

AGUSTIN T. DIOQUINO, CONSUELO VDA. DE GIBAGA, LILIA GIBAGA, accompanied by her husband, JOSE CUESTA... of the decision of the then Intermediate Appellate Court 1 (now Court of Appeals) in AC-G.R. SP. Nos. 02113-14...

G.R. No. 179061 | 2009-07-13

Decision and August 1, 2007 Resolution of the Court of Appeals,[1] which affirmed the trial court's...

G.R. No. L-22702 | 1969-07-28

VICENTE A. GOMEZ, plaintiff-appellant, vs. CENTRAL VEGETABLE OIL MANUFACTURING COMPANY, defendant... No. 1787. 1 In support thereof, the appellant cites the case of Nadura vs. Benguet Consolidated, Inc...

G.R. No. 11730 | 1917-03-24

FELIx NATE, plaintiff-appellee, vs. THE MANILA RAILROAD COMPANY, defendant-appellant.... Jeres de la Frontera for the purposes required by law." For the foregoing reasons the judgment...