Back

Ruperto Sanchez, Et Al. vs. Court Of Industrial Relations, Et Al.

RUPERTO SANCHEZ, doing business under the name and style of PRESERVER SHOE COMPANY and MODESTO SANCHEZ, petitioners, vs. THE COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, PRESERVER SHOE WORKERS' UNION, - NAFLU, FRANCISCO TORRIGOZA and 42 other MEMBERS OF PRESERVER SHOE WORKERS' UNION, - NAFLU, respondents.

G.R. No. L-26932 | 1969-03-28

D E C I S I O N 


FERNANDO, J.: 

In line with the statutory mandate that once an unfair labor practice was shown to have been indulged in, there should be reinstatement with back pay of the aggrieved employees, 1 petitioners were required by our ruling in the parent case, 2 affirming a decision of the respondent Court of Industrial Relations, to reinstate the workers mentioned in the petition therein filed and the payment to them of their back wages from May 18, 1958, until the date of compliance therewith. Our decision having become final, the respondent Court of Industrial Relations took the necessary steps for the enforcement...