Back

Zacarias A. Ticzon vs.COMELEC [SEPERATE OPINION, DE CASTRO, J., concurring]

ZACARIAS A. TICZON, petitioner, vs. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, respondent. / ZACARIAS A. TICZON, petitioner vs. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, BOARD OF CANVASSERS OF SAN PABLO CITY and ANTONIO B. COSICO, respondents. CESAR P. DIZON, intervenor. / RAMON ARMEDILLA, petitioner, vs. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS and CESAR P. DIZON, respondents. [SEPERATE OPINION, DE CASTRO, J., concurring]

G.R. No. L-52451 | 1981-03-31

Separate Opinions 

DE CASTRO, J., concurring:

I concur. I wish, however, to write this separate opinion not so much to place its weight behind one of the contending parties and thereby advance his cause against the other, but more to raise a voice of defense of COMELEC, which came under a scathing attack in the dissenting opinion of Justice Teehankee (hereafter referred to for brevity as "dissent") which, to me, is unkind and undeserved. 

I assuredly am one with my brethren who would feel serious concern and strong displeasure for any act of disrespect, disregard or disobedience to any court order, writ or process. But looking at...