Back

Juan F. Nakpil and Sons etal vs Court of Appeals etal/ United Const and Carlos vs CA, PBA, Nakpil

JUAN F. NAKPIL & SONS and JUAN F. NAKPIL, petitioners, vs. THE COURT OF APPEALS, UNITED CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., JUAN J. CARLOS, and the PHILIPPINE BAR ASSOCIATION, respondents. ******* THE UNITED CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. and JUAN J. CARLOS, petitioners, vs. THE COURT OF APPEALS, THE PHILIPPINE BAR ASSOCIATION, JUAN F. NAKPIL & SONS, and JUAN F. NAKPIL, respondents. ******** PHILIPPINE BAR ASSOCIATION, petitioner, vs. THE COURT OF APPEALS, UNITED CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., and JUAN J. CARLOS, and JUAN F. NAKPIL & SONS and JUAN F. NAKPIL, respondents.

G.R. No. L-47851 | 1988-04-15

R E S O L U T I O N


PARAS, J.:

This is a motion for reconsideration of the October 3, 1986 decision of this Court, filed by the United Construction Co., Inc., the decretal portion of which reads:

"WHEREFORE, the decision appealed from is hereby MODIFIED and considering the special and environmental circumstances of this case, we deem it reasonable to render a decision imposing, as We do hereby impose, upon the defendant and the third-party defendants (with the exception of Roman Ozaeta) a solidary (Art. 1723, Civil Code, Supra, p. 10) indemnity in favor of the Philippine Bar Association of FIVE MILLION (P5,000,000.00) Pesos to cover...