Back

Nobio Sardane vs. Court of Appeals, etal.

NOBIO SARDANE, petitioner, vs. THE COURT OF APPEAL and ROMEO J. ACOJEDO respondents.

G.R. No. L-47045 | 1988-11-22

D E C I S I O N


REGALADO, J.:

The extensive discussion and exhaustive disquisition in the decision 1 of the respondent Court 2 should have written finis to this case without further recourse to Us. The assignment of errors and arguments raised in the respondent Court by herein private respondent, as the petitioner therein, having been correctly and justifiedly sustained by said court without any reversible error in its conclusions, the present petition must fail.

The assailed decision details the facts and proceedings which spawned the present controversy as follows:

"Petitioner brought an action in the City Court of Dipolog for...