Back

Reliance Surety & Ins. Co., Inc. Vs. National Labor Relations Comm., Et Al.

RELIANCE SURETY & INSURANCE CO., INC, petitioner, vs. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION and RELIANCE SURETY & INSURANCE EMPLOYEES UNION, respondents. Ambrosio Padilla, Mempin & Reyes Law Offices for petitioner. Banzuela, Flores, Miralles, Ra?eses, Sy, Taquio & Associates for private respondent.

G.R. Nos. 86917-18 | 1991-01-25

D E C I S I O N


SARMIENTO, J.:

The only question in this petition for certiorari is whether or not strikers who have been found to have staged an illegal strike may be reinstated to work.

The facts are as follows:

xxx xxx xxx

It appears that to avoid unnecessary loss of productive working time due to personal and non-work-related conversations, personal telephone calls and non-work-connected visits by personnel to other departments, the respondent Reliance Surety Insurance Co., Inc. (company for short) on 21 November 1986, thru the manager (Mr. Celso Eleazar) of its underwriting department, effected a change in the seating...