Back

Lourdes Pena Qua vs. Court of Appeals

LOURDES PENA QUA, assisted by her husband, JAMES QUA, petitioner, vs. THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS (SECOND DIVISION), CARMEN CARILLO, EDUARDO CARILLO, JOSEPHINE CARILLO, REBECCA CARILLO, MARIA CEPRES, CECILIO CEPRES and SALVADOR CARILLO, JR., respondents. Brotamonte Law Office for petitioner. Isabel E. Florin for private respondents.

G.R. No. 95318 | 1991-06-11

D E C I S I O N

GANCAYCO, J.:

This case deals with the issue of whether or not private respondents possess the status of agricultural tenants entitled to, among others, the use and possession of a home lot.

Respondent Court of Appeals, 1 in denying due course to the petition for certiorari filed by petitioner, stated the antecedents of this case in the lower courts as follows:

. . . [O]n July 17, 1986, petitioner Lourdes Peña Qua filed a complaint for ejectment with damages against private respondents claiming that she is the owner of a parcel of residential land, Lot No. 2099 of the Malinao Cadastre, situated at Poblacion, Tinapi,...