Back

Aris (Phil.) Inc. Vs. National Labor Relations Commission, Et Al.

ARIS (PHIL.) INC., petitioner, vs. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, LABOR ARBITER FELIPE GARDUQUE III, LEODEGARIO DE GUZMAN, LILIA PEREZ, ROBERTO BESTAMONTE, AIDA OPENA, REYNALDO TORIADO, APOLINARIO GAGAHINA, RUFINO DE CASTRO, FLORDELIZA RAYOS DEL SOL, STEVE SANCHO, ESTER CAIRO, MARIETA MAGALAD, and MARY B. NADALA, respondents. Cesar C. Cruz & Partners for petitioner. Zosimo Morillo for respondent Rayos del Sol. Banzuela, Flores, Miralles, Raneses, Sy & Associates for private respondents.

G.R. No. 90501 | 1991-08-05

D E C I S I O N


DAVIDE, JR., J.:

Petitioner assails the constitutionality of the amendment introduced by Section 12 of Republic Act No. 6715 to Article 223 of the Labor Code of the Philippines (PD. No. 442, as amended) allowing execution pending appeal of the reinstatement aspect of a decision of a labor arbiter reinstating a dismissed or separated employee and of Section 2 of the NLRC Interim Rules on Appeals under R.A. No. 6715 implementing the same. It also questions the validity of the Transitory Provision (Section 17) of the said Interim Rules.

The challenged portion of Section 12 of Republic Act No. 6715, which took effect on 21...