Back

Rodolfo Encarnacion Vs. Dynasty Amusement Center Corporation, Et Al.

RODOLFO ENCARNACION, petitioner, vs. DYNASTY AMUSEMENT CENTER CORPORATION, LORENZO CO and LUCISNO TAN, respondents.

G.R. No. 51289 | 1992-09-02

D E C I S I O N


MELO, J.:

This refers to the appeal from the October 24 and November 20, 1978 Orders of the then Court of First Instance of Manila, Branch XI, at that time presided over by the Honorable Elias B. Asuncion, dismissing the complaint on the ground that the case is principally a labor case.

In 1975, petitioner was employed as a projectionist by respondent Dynasty Amusement Center of which the other respondents are officers. On September 29, 1978, petitioner filed a complaint for damages with the then Court of First Instance of Manila, alleging among others, that he was suspended or had been disallowed to work and that was...