Back

GVM, Inc. Vs. Armando De Guzman

GVM, INC., AS SEC-APEOPLEOINTED RECEIVER FOR FUIFC AND FNCC CAPITAL CORPORATION, complainant, vs. ARMANDO DE GUZMAN, DEPUTY SHERIFF OF RIZAL DETAILED AT MAKATI, METRO MANILA, respondent.

A.M. No. R-284-P | 1993-11-11

D E C I S I O N


PER CURIAM:

The issue posed in this administrative complaint is whether the respondent sheriff, Armando M. de Guzman, is liable administratively for enforcing, in a very harsh and oppressive manner, a writ of possession two (2) days before the authorized date set for its implementation.

In support of its complaint, the complainant, GVM, Inc., points to the fact that the respondent was not the regular sheriff attached to the court which issued the writ of possession but a special sheriff. Not only was he appointed rather hastily, but he also destroyed valuable pieces of evidence which complainant had been assiduously...