Back

Clarita Hermoso and Victoria Hermoso vs CA, Sps Palaganas, et al

CLARITA P. HERMOSO and VICTORIA P. HERMOSO, petitioners, vs. COURT OF APPEALS, SPOUSES CEFERINO C. PALAGANAS, AZUCENA R. PALAGANAS and DR. AMANDA C. PALAGANAS, respondents.

G.R. No. 108580 | 1998-12-29

D E C I S I O N

MARTINEZ, J.:

This petition seeks the review of the decision dated July 24, 1992[1] of the Court of appeals which reversed the decision dated February 15, 1990 of the Regional Trial Court of Bulacan in an action for legal redemption instituted by the petitioners against the private respondents. The motion for reconsideration of petitioners was likewise denied by the respondent court in its resolution dated December 22, 1992.[2]

There is not much dispute about the background facts, thus we quote with favor the factual antecedents as summarized by the Court of Appeals, to wit:

"Emilio Hermoso, now dceased, and plaintiff...