Back

Unlingo, Tipace, et al vs CA, Judge Mendiola, Br63

GODOFREDO UNLINGO, ZENAIDA TIPACE, MERLYN ARAOJO, YOLANDA GUPILAN, ARTURO PATULAN, DAVID VILLAR, GLEN ARIOLA, MAXIMO GONZALES, ANGIE NAVARRO, RUEL DIVINA, ARON INFANTE, LIZA CORPUZ, and STO. NI?O DE CUL DE SAC HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INC., petitioners, vs. THE HON. COURT OF APPEALS, HON. RUBEN A. MENDIOLA, Presiding Judge, Br. 63, Makati, BIENVENIDO R. DINO, RUBEN DINO, EDGARDO S. FERRY, WILFREDO E. NERY, IMELDA P. NIEVA, JOB E. FERNANDEZ, ZAIDE B. ABDULLAH, JOSELITO F. FLOR, FRANCISCO C. QUINQUERO, ANGELES C. TAMAYO, ROGELIO B. UY, EMILIO L. ESPINIDA, MARIANITA L. DE GUZMAN, NOEL ODENA and STO. NI?O DE CUL DE SAC NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, INC., and JULIAN GO, respondents.

G.R. No. 123910 | 1999-04-05

D E C I S I O N


KAPUNAN, J.:

This special civil action for certiorari under Rule 65 of the Rules of Court was instituted by petitioners to set aside the decision of the Court of Appeals dated 13 October 1995 dismissing their petition for certiorari and prohibition for lack of merit. Similarly assailed is the Court of Appeals' resolution dated 2 January 1996 denying petitioners' motion for reconsideration of said decision.

The issue to be resolved in this case is whether it is the ordinary courts or the Home Insurance and Guarantee Corporation which has jurisdiction over the corporate controversy between the contending groups both of...