Back

MA. VALENTINA SANTANA-CRUZ, in her capacity as the Administratrix of the Intestate Estate of the late Francisco D. Santana vs CA, PATROCINIA JUANSON-CUIZON, FELIPE RIPLE, ELISA MARILAO, JOSE POBLETE, FELIX POBLETE, FRANCISCO TOLENTINO, FLORENTINO TOLENTINO, HOSPICIO TOLENTINO, VIRGINIA TOLENTINO, MAXIMINA TOLENTINO, PACITA MARILAO, MARIA MARILAO, REYNALDO MARILAO, FRANCISCO MARILAO, JR., AND CRISANTA MARILAO

MA. VALENTINA SANTANA-CRUZ, in her capacity as the Administratrix of the Intestate Estate of the late Francisco D. Santana, petitioner, vs. COURT OF APPEALS, PATROCINIA JUANSON-CUIZON, FELIPE RIPLE, ELISA MARILAO, JOSE POBLETE, FELIX POBLETE, FRANCISCO TOLENTINO, FLORENTINO TOLENTINO, HOSPICIO TOLENTINO, VIRGINIA TOLENTINO, MAXIMINA TOLENTINO, PACITA MARILAO, MARIA MARILAO, REYNALDO MARILAO, FRANCISCO MARILAO, JR., AND CRISANTA MARILAO, respondents.

G.R. No. 120176 | 2001-07-20

D E C I S I O N

DE LEON, JR., J.:

Before us is an appeal from the Resolutions[1] of the Court of Appeals[2] promulgated on February 9, 1995[3] and April 21, 1995[4] setting aside its Decision dated October 12, 1994, thereby holding that the private respondents' complaint for revival/execution of judgment has not prescribed, and thereafter denying petitioner's manifestation and motion for a special order praying for the recall and nullification of the Resolution dated February 9, 1995.

The facts are as follows:

On March 23, 1993, Attorney-in-Fact Patrocinia Juanson-Cuizon, representing private respondents Felipe Riple, Elisa Marilao,...