Back

Rodil Enterprises vs CA, Carmen Bondoc, et al

RODIL ENTERPRISES, INC., petitioner, vs. COURT OF APPEALS, CARMEN BONDOC, TERESITA BONDOC-ESTO, DIVISORIA FOOTWEAR and CHUA HUAY SOON, respondents.

G.R. No. 129609 | 2001-11-29

D E C I S I O N

BELLOSILLO, J.:

These twin petitions filed under Rule 45 seek to set aside the Decisions of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. Nos. 39919, 36381 and 37243.

Petitioner Rodil Enterprises Inc. (RODIL) is the lessee of the Ides O'Racca Building (O'RACCA) since 1959.[1] It was a "former alien property" over which the Republic of the Philippines acquired ownership by virtue of RA 477, as amended.[2]

Sometime in 1980 RODIL entered into a sublease contract with respondents Carmen Bondoc, Teresita Bondoc-Esto, Divisoria Footwear and Chua Huay Soon,[3] members of the Ides O'Racca Building Tenants Association Inc. (ASSOCIATION).

On...