Back

Dily Dany Nacpil vs International Broadcasting Corp.

DILY DANY NACPIL, petitioner, vs. INTERNATIONAL BROADCASTING CORPORATION, respondent.

G.R. No. 144767 | 2002-03-21

INTRA-CORPORATE CONTROVERSY

Facts:

Petitioner file with the Labor Arbiter a case for illegal dismissal and non-payment of benefits. Respondents argue that the Labor Arbiter had no jurisdiction over the case. The decision of the Labor favoring petitioner was affirmed by the NLRC, the CA reversed the decision of the NLRC.
Petitioner claims that he was not appointed by the IBC Board of Directors as comptroller, but he was appointed a such by the General Manager.

Hence, the Labor Arbiter had jurisdiction over the case & not the Securities & Exchange Commission.



D E C I S I O N

KAPUNAN, J.:

This is a petition for review on certiorari...