Back

Josefina Benares vs. Jaime Pancho, et al.

JOSEFINA BENARES, Petitioner, versus JAIME PANCHO, RODOLFO PANCHO, JR., JOSELITO MEDALLA, PAQUITO MAGALLANES, ALICIA MAGALLANES, EVELYN MAGALLANES, VIOLETA VILLACAMPA, MARITESS PANCHO, ROGELIO PANCHO AND ARNOLFO PANCHO, Respondents.

G.R. No. 151827 | 2005-04-29

D E C I S I O N 


Tinga, J.: 

Assailed in this Petition for Review on Certiorari[1] is the Decision[2] of the Court of Appeals which affirmed the National Labor Relations Commission's (NLRC) decision[3] holding that respondents were illegally dismissed and ordering petitioner to pay respondents separation pay, backwages, 13th month pay, Cost of Living Allowance (COLA), emergency relief allowance (ERA), salary differentials and attorney's fees. The NLRC reversed the Labor Arbiter's finding that respondents failed to lay down the facts and circumstances surrounding their dismissal and to prove their entitlement to monetary...