Back

Andrea Camposagrado, et al. vs. Pablo S. Camposagrado, et al.

ANDREA CAMPOSAGRADO, VIRGINIA CAMPOSAGRADO, ESTER CAMPOSAGRADO, Represented by her attorney-in-fact, FE C. MAGSAMBOL, and GUILLERMA CAMPOSAGRADO, represented by her attorney-in-fact, RENATO S. CAMPOSAGRADO, Petitioners, versus PABLO S. CAMPOSAGRADO and The Hon. COURT OF APPEALS, Respondents.

G.R. No. 143195 | 2005-09-13

SECOND DIVISION

D E C I S I O N 

AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.: 

Before this Court is a petition for review under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court seeking the reversal of the Resolution, dated June 17, 1999, issued by the Court of Appeals (CA) which reads as follows: 

Considering the report, dated May 24, 1999, of the Judicial Records Division (page 1 of the Rollo) to the effect that the appellants failed to pay in full the required docket and other legal fees, this Court resolved to DISMISS the appeal, pursuant to Section 4, Rule 41 in relation to Section 1(c), Rule 50 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.[1] ...