Back

C. M. Benedicto, et al. vs. PNB

CARLOS M. BENEDICTO and ELIZA BENEDICTO and ANTONIO V. BENEDICTO and PACIENCIA BENEDICTO,[1] Petitioners, versus PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK,[2] Respondent.

G.R. No. 126108 | 2007-02-28

D E C I S I O N
 


CORONA, J.:

In this petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court, petitioners raise this question of law: whether or not RA 7202[3] and its Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) are applicable to the case at bar.

The findings of fact of the trial court[4] and the Court of Appeals[5] follow.

On various dates,[6] petitioners Carlos Benedicto, Eliza Benedicto, Antonio Benedicto and Paciencia Benedicto, jointly and severally, obtained from respondent Philippine National Bank several loans amounting to P251,908.65 [7] secured by real estate mortgage over properties covered by TCT Nos. T-6971, T-2055...