Back

Armando F. Chan vs. Hon. Simeon V. Marcelo, et al

ARMANDO F. CHAN, Petitioner, versus HON. SIMEON V. MARCELO, in his capacity as OMBUDSMAN, ANTONIO A. ODEJERTE, Borongan, Eastern Samar, DAVID P. ADONGAY, JR., and VIRGILIO G. ALERIA - All from Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) Engineering District, Catarman, Northern Samar, Respondents.*

G.R. NO. 159298 | 2007-07-06

D E C I S I O N
 


AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.:

Armando F. Chan (petitioner) assails in his Petition for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court the August 29, 2002 Decision[1] of the Court of Appeals (CA), docketed as CA-G.R. SP No. 68022, affirming the March 1, 2001 Decision of the Office of the Ombudsman (Ombudsman), as well as the CA's July 25, 2003 Resolution, denying his Motion for Reconsideration.[2]

The material facts are of record.

In his Affidavit-Complaint,[3] docketed as OMB-ADM-0-99-0431, petitioner charged before the Ombudsman the following officials of the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH), Northern...