Back

Dr. Ulysses A. Brito vs. Office of the Deputy Ombudsman for Luzon et al.

DR. ULYSSES A. BRITO, (IN HIS CAPACITY AS OIC-REGIONAL DIRECTOR OF THE NCIP REGION IV), PETITIONER, VERSUS OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY OMBUDSMAN FOR LUZON, SANDY P. PADILLA AND MONICO A. DINGAL, JR., RESPONDENTS.

G.R. Nos. 167335 & 167337 | 2007-07-10

D E C I S I O N
 


CHICO-NAZARIO, J.:

For the Court's consideration are two consolidated petitions: (1) G.R. Nos. 167335 & 167337, a Petition for Certiorari under Rule 65 of the Rules of Court, seeking to nullify and set aside the Joint Order[1] dated 7 December 2004 of the Deputy Ombudsman for Luzon which resolved the criminal aspect of the charges against private respondents Sandy P. Padilla and Monico A. Dingal, Jr. in their favor; and (2) G.R. No. 173152, a Petition for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court, seeking the reversal of the Court of Appeals' Resolution[2] dated 18 October 2005 denying...