Back

Digna Consumido vs. Hon. Reynaldo G. Ros, et al

DIGNA CONSUMIDO, Petitioner, versus HON. REYNALDO G. ROS, Presiding Judge, Regional Trial Court of Manila, Branch 33, RAMON SAURA, JR., and FATIMA SAURA, Respondents.

G.R. No. 166875 | 2007-07-31

D E C I S I O N
 


Tinga, J.:

The instant Rule 45 petition assails the Decision[1] dated 13 September 2004 and the Resolution[2] dated 24 January 2005 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 75285. The appellate court's Decision affirmed the Regional Trial Court's (RTC) reversal[3] of the Metropolitan Trial Court's (MeTC) judgment[4] dismissing the ejectment complaint filed against petitioner while the Resolution denied her motion for reconsideration.[5]

In their ejectment[6] complaint before the MeTC of Manila, docketed as Civil Case No. 170458, respondent spouses Ramon, Jr. and Fatima Saura averred that sometime in 1995,...