Back

Linton Commercial Co. Inc., et al. vs. Alex A. Hellera, et al

LINTON COMMERCIAL CO., INC. and DESIREE ONG, Petitioners, versus ALEX A. HELLERA, FRANCISCO RACASA, DANTE ESCARLAN, DONATO SASA, RODOLFO OLINAR, DANIEL CUSTODIO, ARTURO POLLO, ROBERT OPELINA, B. PILAPIL, WINIFREG BLANDO, JUANITO GUILLERMO, DONATO BONETE, ISAGANI YAP, CESAR RAGONON, BENEDICTO ILAGAN, REXTE SOLANOY, RODOLFO LIM, ERNESTO ALCANTARA, DANTE DUMAPE, FELIPE CAGOCO, JR., JOSE NARCE, NELIO CANTIGA, QUIRINO C. ADA, MANUEL BANZON, JOEL F. ADA, SATPARAM ELMER, ROMEO BALAIS, CLAUDIO S. MORALES, DANILO NORLE, LEONCIO RACASA, NOEL LEONCIO RACASA, NOEL ACEDILLA, ELPIDIO E. VERGABINIA, JR., CONRADO CAGOCO, ROY BORAGOY, EDUARDO GULTIA, REYNALDO SANTOS, LINO VALENCIA, ROY DURANO, LEO VALENCIA, ROBERTO BLANDO, JAYOMA A., NOMER ALTAREJOS, RAMON OLINAR III, SATURNINO C. EBAYA, FERNANDO R. REBUCAS, NICANOR L. DE CASTRO, EDUARDO GONZALES, ISAGANI GONZALES, THOMAS ANDRAB, JR., MINIETO DURANO, ERNESTO VALLENTE, NONITO I. DULA, NESTOR M. BONETE, JOSE SALONOY, ALBERTO LAGMAN, ROLANDO TORRES, ROLANDO TOLDO, ROLINDO CUALQUIERA, ARMANDO LIMA, FELIX D. DUMARE, ALFREDO SELAPIO, MARTIN V. VILLACAMPA, JR., CARLITO PABLE, DANTE ESCARLAN, M. DURANO, RAMON ROSO, LORETA RAFAEL, and ELEZAR MELLEJOR, Respondents.

G.R. No. 163147 | 2007-10-10

D E C I S I O N
 

Tinga, J.:

This is a petition for review under Rule 45 of the Rules of Civil Procedure seeking the reversal of the Decision[1] of the Court of Appeals promulgated on 12 December 2003 as well as its Resolution[2] promulgated on 2 April 2004 denying petitioners' motion for reconsideration.

This case originated from a labor complaint filed before the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) in which herein respondents contended that petitioner Linton Commercial Company, Inc. (Linton) had committed illegal reduction of work when it imposed a reduction of work hours thereby affecting its employees.

Linton is a domestic...