Back

The Heirs of the Late Panfilo Vs. Pajarillo

THE HEIRS OF THE LATE PANFILO V. PAJARILLO, Petitioners, versus THE HON. COURT OF APPEALS, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION and SAMAHAN NG MGA MANGGAGAWA NG PANFILO V. PAJARILLO, ALFREDO HOYOHOY, HERMINIO CASTILLO, BERNARDO ROCO, RODOLFO TORRES, JULIAN JORVINA, LOURDES ROCO, FLORITA YAPOC, MARLON ALDANA, PARALUMAN ULANG, TOLENTINO SANHI, JOHNNY SORIANO, ANDRES CALAQUE, ROBERTO LAVAREZ, FRANCISCO MORALES, SALVACION PERINA, ANTONIO ABALA, ROMEO SALONGA, AUGUR M. MANIPOL, BIENVENIDA TEQUIL, MARIO ELEP, ALADINO LATIGO, BERNARDINE BANSAL, PEDRO DE BAGUIO, RICARDO CALICA, LAURA CO, VICENTE RECANA, ELENA TOLLEDO, ALFREDO PLAZA, SR., HERMINIO BALDONO, FELIPE YAPOC, ARISTON NIPA, and ALFONSO C. BALDOMAR, Respondents.

G.R. No. 155056-57 | 2007-10-19

D E C I S I O N


CHICO-NAZARIO, J.:

In this Petition for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court,[1] petitioners, heirs of Panfilo V. Pajarillo, seek to set aside the Decision,[2] and Resolution,[3] dated 12 March 2002 and 28 August 2002, respectively, of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 54330 and CA-G.R. SP No. 54331, reversing the two Per Curiam Orders dated 28 October 1996 and 10 January 1997,[4] of the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) in NLRC NCR Cases No. 08-03013-87 and 01-00331-88.

Stripped of the non-essentials, the facts are as follows:


Panfilo V. Pajarillo (Panfilo) was the owner and operator...