Back

[4/5] Manotok Realty Inc. Vs. CLT Realty Development Corp

[4/5] MANOTOK REALTY, INC. and MANOTOK ESTATE CORPORATION, Petitioners, versus CLT REALTY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Respondent.

G.R. No. 123346 | 2007-12-14

Clearly, the findings and conclusions of the trial courts and the Court of Appeals that petitioners' titles are spurious are based on hard facts fully supported by the records and thoroughly discussed in their respective Decisions. They cannot simply be brushed aside without running afoul to settled principles of law.

It is appalling to note that, as observed by the Court of Appeals, the Araneta Institute "never raised a single argument or assignment of error disputing these factual findings of the trial court." Its failure to refute not only indicates the frailty or emptiness of its cause, but also validates the correcness of the...