Back

Vivares Vs. Reyes

JULIO A. VIVARES and MILA G. IGNALING, Petitioners, versus ENGR. JOSE J. REYES, Respondent.

G.R. No. 155408 | 2008-02-13

D E C I S I O N


VELASCO, JR., J.:

The Case

The kernel dispute in this petition under Rule 45 is the legality of the May 22, 2001 Resolution[1] of the Camiguin Regional Trial Court (RTC), Branch 28 in Civil Case No. 517, which placed the estate of Severino Reyes under receivership. The Court of Appeals (CA) saw it differently in CA-G.R. SP No. 67492-its June 18, 2002 Decision[2] recalled the RTC directive on the appointment of the receiver, prompting Julio Vivares and Mila Ignaling to file the petition at bar to convince the Court to reinstate the receivership.

The Facts

Severino Reyes was the father of respondent Jose Reyes and...