Back

Manotok Vs. Barque [ DISSENTING OPINION, CHICO-NAZARION, J. ]

SEVERINO M. MANOTOK IV, FROILAN M. MANOTOK, FERNANDO M. MANOTOK III, MA. MAMERTA M. MANOTOK, PATRICIA L. TIONGSON, PACITA L. GO, ROBERTO LAPERAL III, MICHAEL MARSHALL V. MANOTOK, MARY ANN MANOTOK, FELISA MYLENE V. MANOTOK, IGNACIO MANOTOK, JR., MILAGROS V. MANOTOK, SEVERINO MANOTOK III, ROSA R. MANOTOK, MIGUEL A.B. SISON, GEORGE M. BOCANEGRA, MA. CRISTINA E. SISON, PHILIPP L. MANOTOK, JOSE CLEMENTE L. MANOTOK, RAMON SEVERINO L. MANOTOK, THELMA R. MANOTOK, JOSE MARIA MANOTOK, JESUS JUDE MANOTOK, JR., and MA. THERESA L. MANOTOK, represented by their Attorney-in-fact, Rosa R. Manotok, Petitioners, versus HEIRS OF HOMER L. BARQUE, Represented by TERESITA BARQUE HERNANDEZ, Respondents.

G.R. No. 162335 & 162605 | 2008-12-18

DISSENTING OPINION


CHICO-NAZARIO, J.:

This is to express my dissent in the majority opinion which set aside the final and executory Decision dated 12 December 2005 of the First Division of this Court, recalled the Entry of Judgment recorded on 2 May 2006 in the present cases, and remanded the same to the Court of Appeals for reception of further evidence.

I emphatically call attention to the fact that the Decision, dated 12 December 2005, the fallo of which reads -

WHEREFORE, the petitions are DENIED. In G.R. No. 162335, the February 24, 2004 Amended Decision of the Third Division of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 66642, ordering the...