Back

Rodomeil J. Domingo Vs. Office of the Ombudsman, Kathryn Joy B. Paguio, et al.

RODOMIEL J. DOMINGO, Petitioner, versus OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN KATHRYN JOY B. PAGUIO, ALLAN JAY M. ESGUERRA, and NEIL PATRICK H. CELIS, Respondents.

G.R. No. 176127 | 2009-01-30

D E C I S I O N


Tinga, J.:

Assailed in this petition is the Decision[1] dated 20 September 2006 as well as the resolution[2] dated 5 January 2007 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 92597, affirming in toto the decision of the Office of the Ombudsman[3] (OMB) in OMB-C-A-05-0007-A, finding Rodomiel J. Domingo (petitioner) guilty of violation of Section 4(b) of Republic Act (R.A.) No. 6713[4] and imposing upon him the penalty of suspension for a period of six (6) months.

The antecedent facts follow.

A complaint-affidavit was filed before the Office of the Ombudsman by Sangguniang Kabataan (SK) officials Kathryn Joy Paguio, Allan...