Back

Modesta Luna Vs. Juliana P. Luna, et al.

MODESTA LUNA, Petitioner, versus JULIANA P. LUNA, CORNELIO, MILAGROS, RENATO, FLORDELITA, AURORA, ANDRITO and GEORGE all surnamed GARCILLA, Respondents.

G.R. No. 177624 | 2009-07-13

DECISION


NACHURA, J.:

Petitioner assails in this Rule 45 petition the January 29, 2007 Decision[1] and the April 20, 2007 Resolution[2] of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 90749. The appellate court, in the assailed decision, dismissed petitioner's complaint on the ground of prescription, and, in the challenged resolution, denied her motion for reconsideration for lack of merit.

The antecedent facts and proceedings follow.

Petitioner Modesta A. Luna filed with the Municipal Trial Court (MTC) of Pulilan, Bulacan, on March 9, 1999, a Complaint[3] docketed as Civil Case No. 767 for the recovery of ownership and possession of a...