Back

Gualberto Aguanza Vs. Asian Terminal, Inc., et al.

GUALBERTO AGUANZA, Petitioner, versus ASIAN TERMINAL, INC., KEITH JAMES, RICHARD BARCLAY, and ATTY. RODOLFO CORVITE, Respondents.

G.R. No. 163505 | 2009-08-14

D E C I S I O N


CARPIO, J.:

The Case

This is a petition for review[1] assailing the Decision[2] promulgated on 9 January 2004 of the Court of Appeals (appellate court) as well as the Resolution[3] promulgated on 5 May 2004 in CA-G.R. SP No. 74626. The appellate court denied Gualberto Aguanza's (Aguanza) petition for certiorari and ruled that the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) was correct when it held that the transfer of the base of Asian Terminal, Inc.'s (ATI) Bismark IV from Manila to Bataan was a valid exercise of management prerogative. Thus, Aguanza was no longer entitled to receive out-of-port allowance and meal...