Back

[2/4] Ernesto Francisco, Jr. Vs. Ombudsman Aniano A. Desierto, et al.

[2/4] ERNESTO FRANCISCO, JR., Petitioner, versus OMBUDSMAN ANIANO A. DESIERTO, JOSEPH EJERCITO ESTRADA, MARIANO Z. VELARDE, FRANKLIN M. VELARDE, ROBERT C. NACIANCENO, REY DIVINO S. DAVAL-SANTOS, SOLEDAD S. MEDINA-CUE, PATRICK B. GATAN, LUIS V. MEDINA-CUE, SILVESTRE A. DE LEON, RAMON V. DUMAUAL, RUBEN A. DE OCAMPO, MARIANO A. BENEDICTO II, GREGORIO R. VIGILAR, LUIS JUAN L. VIRATA, CESAR E. A. VIRATA, MANUEL B. ZAMORA, JR., RONALDO B. ZAMORA, FRISCO F. SAN JUAN and ARSENIO B. YULO Respondents.

G.R. No. 154117 | 2009-10-02

Petitioner likewise claims that based on the 1999 tax declarations, AMVEL sold parcels of land, which were "undeveloped agricultural lands and salt-making beds (salinar) but which had been reclassified as 'residential,' to the government at a price which was more than 2,300% percent of their total declared market value and 11,700% percent of their total assessed value."[40]

Petitioner asserts that the purchase price for right-of-way acquisition "should be the equivalent of the zonal value plus ten (10%) percent thereof," based on Administrative Order No. 50,[41] which respondent Estrada issued on February 17, 1999 and was made effective...