Back

Office of the Ombudsman Vs. Maximo D. Sison

OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, Petitioner, versus MAXIMO D. SISON, Respondent

G.R. No. 185954 | 2010-02-16

D E C I S I O N


VELASCO, JR., J.:

The Case

Before us is a Petition for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45 assailing and seeking to set aside the Resolution[1] dated December 18, 2008 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 96611, entitled Maximo D. Sison v. Fr. Noel Labendia for Himself and in Representation of Isog Han Samar Movement, Diocese of Calbayog, Catbalogan, Samar. The CA Resolution denied petitioner Office of the Ombudsman's Omnibus Motion for Intervention and to Admit Attached Motion for Reconsideration of the CA's June 26, 2008 Decision.[2]

The Facts

On October 11, 2004, the Isog Han Samar Movement, represented by...