Back

Metropolitan Bank and Trust Company Vs. Rogelio Reynaldo and Jose C. Adrandea

METROPOLITAN BANK and TRUST COMPANY, Petitioner, versus ROGELIO REYNADO and JOSE C. ADRANDEA,** Respondents.

G.R. No. 164538 | 2010-07-09

D E C I S I O N


DEL CASTILLO, J.:

"It is a hornbook doctrine in our criminal law that the criminal liability for estafa is not affected by a compromise, for it is a public offense which must be prosecuted and punished by the government on its own motion, even though complete reparation [has] been made of the damage suffered by the private offended party. Since a criminal offense like estafa is committed against the State, the private offended party may not waive or extinguish the criminal liability that the law imposes for the commission of the crime."[1]

This Petition for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court seeks...