Back

Judy O. Dacuital, et al. Vs. L.M. Camus Engineering Corporation, et al.

JUDY O. DACUITAL,[1] EUGENIO L. MONDANO, JR., JOSEPH GALER, [2] MARIANO MORALES, ROBERTO RUANCE, JOSEPH PORCADILLA, RAULITO PALAD, RICARDO DIGAMON, NONITO PRISCO , EULOGIO M. TUTOR, MELVIN PEPITO, HELYTO N. REYES,[3] RANDOLF C. BALUDO, ALBERTO EPONDOL, RODELO A. SUSPER,[4] EVARISTO VIGORI, [5] JONATHAN P. AYAAY, FELIPE ERILLA, ARIS A. GARCIA, ROY A. GARCIA, and RESTITUTO TAPANAN, Petitioners, versus L.M. CAMUS ENGINEERING CORPORATION and/or LUIS M. CAMUS, Respondents

G.R. No. 176748 | 2010-09-01

DECISION


NACHURA, J.:

This is a Petition for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court, assailing the Court of Appeals (CA) Decision[6] dated September 25, 2006 and Resolution[7] dated February 14, 2007 in CA-G.R. SP No. 90377.

The case stemmed from the following factual and procedural antecedents:

Respondent L.M. Camus Engineering Corporation (LMCEC) is a domestic corporation duly organized and existing under and by virtue of Philippine laws, engaged in construction, engineering, and air-conditioning business; while respondent Luis M. Camus (Camus) is the company president.

Petitioners Judy O. Dacuital (Dacuital),...