Back

Sps. Moises and Clemencia Andrada vs. Pilhino Sales Corporation, represented by its Branch Manager, Jojo S. Saet

SPS. MOISES and CLEMENCIA ANDRADA, Petitioners, vs. PILHINO SALES CORPORATION, represented by its Branch Manager, JOJO S. SAET, Respondent.

G.R. No. 156448 | 2011-02-23




THIRD DIVISION

D E C I S I O N


BERSAMIN, J.:


An appeal by petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 shall raise only questions of law. Thus, the herein petition for review must fail for raising a question essentially of fact.


Antecedents


On December 28, 1990, respondent Pilhino Sales Corporation (Pilhino) sued Jose Andrada, Jr. and his wife, Maxima, in the Regional Trial Court in Davao City (RTC) to recover the principal sum of P240,863.00, plus interest and incidental charges (Civil Case No. 20,489-90). Upon Pilhino's application, the RTC issued a writ of preliminary attachment, which came to be implemented against a Hino truck and a...