Back

Roque C. Facura and Eduardo F. Tuazon vs. Court of Appeals, Rodolfo S. De Jesus and Edelwina DG. Parungao / Rodolfo S. De Jesus vs. Office of the Ombudsman, et al. / Office of the Ombudsman vs. Edelwina DG. Parungao, et al.

ROQUE C. FACURA and EDUARDO F. TUASON, Petitioners, vs. COURT OF APPEALS, RODOLFO S. DE JESUS and EDELWINA DG. PARUNGAO, Respondents. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RODOLFO S. DE JESUS, Petitioner, vs. OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, EDUARDO F. TUASON, LOCAL WATER UTILITIES ADMINISTRATION (LWUA), represented by its new Administrator Orlando C. Hondrade, Respondents. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, Petitioner, vs. EDELWINA DG. PARUNGAO, and the HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS (Former 7th Division), Respondents.

G.R. No. 166495 / G.R. No. 184129 / G.R. No. 184263 | 2011-02-16



SECOND DIVISION
D E C I S I O N

MENDOZA, J.:

For resolution before this Court are the following:

G.R. No. 166495 is a petition for certiorari filed by Roque Facura (Facura) and Eduardo Tuason (Tuason) assailing the Resolutions1 dated September 22, 2004 and January 4, 2005 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 84902, which granted the applications for preliminary mandatory injunction filed by Atty. Rodolfo De Jesus (De Jesus) and Atty. Edelwina Parungao (Parungao) by ordering their reinstatement to their former positions despite the standing order of dismissal issued by the Office of the Ombudsman (Ombudsman) against them.

G.R. No....