Back

ENRIQUETA M. LOCSIN, PETITIONER, VS. BERNARDO HIZON, CARLOS HIZON, SPS. JOSE MANUEL & LOURDES GUEVARA, RESPONDENTS.

ENRIQUETA M. LOCSIN, PETITIONER, VS. BERNARDO HIZON, CARLOS HIZON, SPS. JOSE MANUEL & LOURDES GUEVARA, RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 204369 | 2014-09-17

THIRD DIVISION
 
D E C I S I O N

VELASCO JR., J.:

Nature of the Case
 
Before Us is a Petition for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45 assailing the Decision1 and Resolution of the Court of Appeals (CA), dated June 6, 2012 and October 30, 2012, respectively, in CA-G.R. CV No. 96659 entitled Enriqueta M. Locsin v. Marylou Bolos, et al. In reversing the ruling of the trial court, the CA held that respondents are innocent purchasers for value and good faith of the subject property.

The Facts
 
Petitioner Enriqueta M. Locsin (Locsin) was the registered owner of a 760-sq.m. lot covered by Transfer Certificate of Title (TCT) No....