Back

SPOUSES ROMEO LL. PLOPENIO AND ROSIELINDA PLOPENIO REPRESENTED BY GAVINO PLOPENIO, PETITIONERS, VS. DEPARTMENT OF AGRARIAN REFORM AND LAND BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES, RESPONDENTS. [G.R. NO. 161092] EDUARDO LL. PLOPENIO REPRESENTED BY GAVINO PLOPENIO, PETITIONER, VS. DEPARTMENT OF AGRARIAN REFORLVI AND LAND BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES, RESPONDENTS.

SPOUSES ROMEO LL. PLOPENIO AND ROSIELINDA PLOPENIO REPRESENTED BY GAVINO PLOPENIO, PETITIONERS, VS. DEPARTMENT OF AGRARIAN REFORM AND LAND BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES, RESPONDENTS. [G.R. NO. 161092] EDUARDO LL. PLOPENIO REPRESENTED BY GAVINO PLOPENIO, PETITIONER, VS. DEPARTMENT OF AGRARIAN REFORLVI AND LAND BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES, RESPONDENTS.

G. R. No. 161090 | 2012-07-04

SECOND DIVISION
 
D E C I S I O N

SERENO, J.:
 
In these consolidated Rule 45 Petitions, we rule on the proper mode of appeal from the decision of a Regional Trial Court (RTC) designated as a Special Agrarian Court (SAC).
 
In G.R. No. 161090, petitioner-spouses Romeo Ll. Plopenio and Rosielinda Plopenio assail the Decision1 and Order2 of the SAC-RTC Branch 23, Naga City, in Civil Case No. 2003-007.
 
In G.R. No. 161092, petitioner Eduardo Ll. Plopenio (Eduardo) questions the Decision3 and Order4 of the same court in Civil Case No. 2003-004.

THE FACTS
 
Petitioner-spouses own 11.8643 hectares of coconut...