Back

OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, PETITIONER, VS. PRUDENCIO C. QUIMBO, COURT OF APPEALS, 20TH DIVISION, CEBU CITY, RESPONDENTS.

OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, PETITIONER, VS. PRUDENCIO C. QUIMBO, COURT OF APPEALS, 20TH DIVISION, CEBU CITY, RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 173277 | 2015-02-25

SECOND DIVISION
 
D E C I S I O N

MENDOZA, J.:
 
This petition for certiorari under Rule 65 of the Rules of Court assails the May 2, 2006 Resolution[1] of the Court of Appeals (CA), in CA-G.R. SP No. 54737, which denied the motion for intervention and reconsideration of its January 21, 2005 Decision,[2] filed by petitioner Office of the Ombudsman (Ombudsman).
 
The Antecedents
 
The present controversy stemmed from the administrative complaint lodged by Gilda D. Daradal (Daradal), a clerk in the Provincial Engineering Office of Catbalogan, Samar, against private respondent Engr. Prudencio C. Quimbo (Quimbo), Provincial Engineer...