Back

Seng Kee & Co. vs. Earnshaw and Piatt 56 Phil. 204

SENG KEE & CO., plaintiff-appellant, vs. TOMAS EARNSHAW, Mayor of the City of Manila, and C. E. PIATT, Chief of Police of said City, defendants-appellees.

G.R. No. 34976 | 1931-10-21

D E C I S I O N

IMPERIAL, J:

The issue in the present case is the validity and constitutionality of sections 120, 121, 122, 1067, and 1068 of the Revised Ordinances, No. 1600 of the City of Manila, the last two only in so far as it refers so the manufacture of the sauce known as toyo.

The plaintiff Seng Kee & Co. appealed from the judgment of the Court of First Instance of Manila, dated October 31, 1930, which held those provisions of the Revised Ordinances valid, dissolved the preliminary injunction, and dismissed the complaint with costs.

In the year 1920 the appellant, a general commercial partnership, established a toyo factory at No....