Back

Office of the Ombudsman vs. Borja

OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, REPRESENTED BY HON. CONCHITA CARPIO MORALES, IN HER CAPACITY AS TANODBAYAN, AND HON. GERARD A. MOSQUERA, IN HIS CAPACITY AS DEPUTY OMBUDSMAN FOR LUZON, PETITIONERS, VS. ROGER F. BORJA, RESPONDENT. [G.R. NO. 201882] LERMA S. PRUDENTE AND DAMASO T. AMBRAY, PETITIONERS, VS. ROGER F. BORJA, RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 201830 | 2015-11-10

D E C I S I O N
 
PERLAS-BERNABE, J.:
 
Before the Court are consolidated petitions[1] assailing the Decision[2] dated October 26, 2011 and the Resolution[3] dated May 9, 2012 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 112008, which reversed and set aside the Decision[4] dated November 27, 2007 and the Orders[5] dated September 22, 2009 and October 12, 2009 of petitioner Office of the Ombudsman (Ombudsman) in OMB-L-A-03-1156-L, finding respondent Roger F. Borja (Borja) guilty of conduct prejudicial to the best interest of the service, thereby imposing upon him the penalty of suspension for one (1) year...