Back

Diaz etc. vs. Spouses Punzalan

MILAGROS DIAZ, EDUARDO Q. CATACUTAN, DANTE Q. CATACUTAN, REPRESENTED BY THEIR COMMON ATTORNEY-IN-FACT, FERNANDO Q. CATACUTAN, PETITIONERS, VS. SPOUSES GAUDENCIO PUNZALAN AND TERESITA PUNZALAN, RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 203075 | 2016-03-16

D E C I S I O N
 
PERALTA, J.:
 
For the Court's Resolution is a Petition for Review under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court which petitioners Milagros Diaz, Eduardo Q. Catacutan, Dante Q. Catacutan, et al. filed, assailing the Decision[1] of the Court of Appeals (CA), dated February 17, 2012, and its Resolution[2] dated July 25, 2012 in CA-G.R. SP No. 112959. The CA reversed the Decision[3] of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of San Fernando, Pampanga, Branch 43, in Civil Case No. 13692, which affirmed the June 22, 2009 Municipal Circuit Trial Court (MCTC) Decision.[4]

The factual and procedural antecedents are as follows:

Petitioners...