Back

Office vs.Retired Judge Chavez

OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR, COMPLAINANT, VS. RETIRED JUDGE PABLO R. CHAVEZ, FORMER PRESIDING JUDGE, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 87, ROSARIO, BATANGAS, ATTY. TEOFILO A. DIMACULANGAN, JR., CLERK OF COURT VI, MR. ARMANDO ERMELITO M. MARQUEZ, COURT INTERPRETER III, MS. EDITHA E. BAGSIC, COURT INTERPRETER III, AND MR. DAVID CAGUIMBAL, PROCESS SERVER, ALL OF REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 87, ROSARIO, BATANGAS, RESPONDENTS. [A.M. No. 12-7-130-RTC] RE: UNDATED ANONYMOUS LETTER-COMPLAINT AGAINST THE PRESIDING JUDGE, CLERK OF COURT AND COURT STENOGRAPHER OF THE REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 87, ROSARIO, BATANGAS.

A.M. No. RTJ-10-2219 | 2017-03-07

Republic of the Philippines
Supreme Court
Manila
 
EN BANC
 
D E C I S I O N
 
PER CURIAM:
 
This administrative matter arose from the judicial audit conducted in the Regional Trial Court (RTC), Branch 87, Rosario, Batangas on March 2 to 4, 2009 in view of the then pending compulsory retirement of Judge Pablo R. Chavez (Judge Chavez) on August 17, 2009 and pursuant to Travel Order No. 09-A-2009.
 
I

Respondent Judge Chavez previously presided over Branch 87 of the RTC of Rosario, Batangas. In a Memorandum[1] dated October 30, 2009, the judicial audit team reported that as of audit date, Branch 87 had a total caseload of...