Back

Ifurung vs. Hon. Carpio

REY NATHANIEL C. IFURUNG, Petitioner, vs. HON. CONCHITA C. CARPIO MORALES in her capacity as the Ombudsman, HON. MELCHOR ARTHUR H. CARANDANG, HON. GERARD ABETO MOSQUERA, HON. PAUL ELMER M. CLEMENTE, HON. RODOLFO M. ELMAN, HON. CYRlL ENGUERRA RAMOS in their capacities as Deputies Ombudsman, and THE OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, Respondents, Present: SERENO, C.J.,* CARPIO,** VELASCO, JR., LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, PERALTA, BERSAMIN, DEL CASTILLO, PERLAS-BERNABE, LEONEN, JARDELEZA, CAGUIOA, MARTIRES, TIJAM, REYES, and GESMUNDO,JJ.

G.R. No. 232131 | 2018-04-24

Republic of the Philippines
Supreme Court
Baguio
 
EN BANC
 
D E C l S l O N
 
MARTIRES, J.:
 
Through this Petition for Certiorari and Prohibition, petitioner Rey Nathaniel C. Ifurung (petitioner), in propria persona, seeks a declaration from the Court that: (a) Section (Sea) 8(3) in relation to Sec. 7 of Republic Act (R.A.) No. 6770, also known as the Ombudsman Act of 1989, is unconstitutional for being an outright transgression of Sec. 11, in relation to Secs. 8 and 10 of Article (Art) XI of the 1987 Constitution; and (b) all individual respondents as de facto Ombudsman and Deputies Ombudsman, respectively, and all these...