Back

Jorge vs. Marcelo

RUFINA S. JORGE, PETITIONER, VS. ALBERTO C. MARCELO, JOEL SAN PASCUAL, ROMEO SALEN, CELSO SANTOS, HIGINO DALANGIN, JR., EDUARDO A. GARCIA, JULIUS FRONDA, ROGELIO VERGARA, LARRY P. TORRES, RODEL L. ZAMORA, ALEXANDER F. SUERTE, EDISIO G. CASEBO, FERNANDO ENORME, NOEL ALMAZAN, REGINO CRUZ, RONALD ALLAM, LOLITO DIZON, CECERON S. PENA, JR., RENATO M. ZONIO, ROBERTO F. LAYUSON, CRISTOSI S. ALBOR, ROGER TIBURCIO, AND THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION (THIRD DIVISION), RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 232989 | 2019-03-18

DECISION
 
PERALTA, J.:
 
This resolves a Petition for Review on Certiorari (with Urgent Prayer for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Writ of Preliminary Injunction) assailing the March 2, 2017[1] and June 23, 2017[2] Resolutions of the Court of Appeals (CA)in CA-G.R. SP No. 149666, which affirmed the August 26, 2016[3] and November 21, 2016[4] Resolutions of the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) denying the Petition for Extraordinary Remedies (with Urgent Prayer for TRO and/or WPI) filed by petitioner Rufina S. Jorge (Rufina) under Rule XII of the 2011 NLRC Rules of...