Back

Burgundy Realty Corporation vs. MAA General Assurance Phils.

BURGUNDY REALTY CORPORATION, ROGELIO T. SERAFICA AND LUIS G. NAKPIL,[*] PETITIONERS, V. MAA GENERAL ASSURANCE PHILS., INC., RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 225610 | 2020-02-19

SECOND DIVISION
 
D E C I S I O N
 
INTING, J.:
 
This is a Petition for Review[1] under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court of the Decision[2] dated April 28, 2016 and Resolution[3] dated July 7, 2016 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 126282. The CA affirmed the Order dated July 10, 2012 of Branch 59, Regional Trial Court (RTC), Makati City in Civil Case No. 12-282 that denied the Urgent Motion to Quash Writ of Attachment with Damages[4] of Burgundy Realty Corporation (Burgundy), Rogelio T. Serafica (Serafica) and Luis G. Nakpil (Nakpil) (collectively, petitioners).
 
Antecedents
 
MAA General...